Congratulations Graduates!

Undergraduates practicing for PLANET competition

Undergraduates practicing for PLANET competition

Congratulations to our Graduates!
The end of the semester always brings a fresh set of students finishing their career at NC State and making their way in the world. We wish this group best wishes for a bright future! See the group of graduating undergraduates and graduate students here!

Undergraduate Graduates for December 2013

Thomas Michael Batts
James Ethan Bridges
Christian Randolph Britt
Jonathan Wayne Currin
Kurtis Craig Durrant
Don Raymond Edwards
Blair A. Lane
Matthew Vernon Leary
Nicole Theresa Lewis
Keith Albert Lukowski
Justin Miles Maness
Stanton Parker McDuffie
Mason C. McNair
Caitlin Iris Miller
Whitney Duncan Phillips
Kimberly May Shearer
Timothy Aric Weiler
Amanda Michelle Wilkins
Worth E. Williams

Undergraduate Certificate Graduates

Jerry Lane Cloninger
Rodney “Pete” Franklin Pearce
John Robert Suggs

Agricultural Institute Graduates

Joshua D. Jackson
James Robert Konowski
Christian Gregory Lonnecker
Tiffany Minjarez
Edward Alton Owens
Michael Dean Sizemore
Graham Lee Walker



Ms. Jamie Mikaela Anderson, Dr. Helen Kraus, Advisor


Ms. Xiaolin Huang (In Absentia) – Ms. Julieta Sherk, Chair
Sustainable Residential Design:  An Aesthetic, Environmental, and Area Use Assessment and Evaluation

Ms. Biaofei Jiang (In Absentia) – Ms. Julieta Sherk, Chair
Street Tree Planting Methods & the Impact on the Quality of the Streetscape: A Case Study in Downtown Raleigh

Ms. Dana R. Reynolds (In Absentia) – Dr. Lucy Bradley, Chair
Planting the Seed of a Children’s Garden

Ms. Michelle A. Rose – Ms. Anne Spafford, Chair
Valuing the Residential Landscape: Comparison of Selected Ecosystem Service Benefits between Conventional and Sustainable Design


Mr. Jared G. Barnes – Dr. Paul Nelson and Dr. Brian Whipker, Co-chairs
Quantifying the Factors that Influence Root Substrate pH

Ms. Connie Landis Fisk (In Absentia) – Dr. Mike Parker and Dr. Penny Perkins-Veazie, Chair and Vice-chair
Effect of Orchard Management Practices on Peach Tree Growth, Yield, and Soil Ecology

Ms. Suzanne O’Connell – Dr. Nancy Creamer, Chair
Short-term Nitrogen Mineralization and Soil Microbial Response to the Incorporation of Warm-season Cover Crops in Organic Farming Systems

Mr. Steven M. Todd (In Absentia) – Dr. Craig Yencho, Chair
Application of Near-infrared Spectroscopy to Study Inheritance of Sweetpotato Composition Traits

Postharvest Treatment of Specialty Cut Flowers

As part of our yearly cut flower trials, we conduct vase life studies on cultivars that show potential as future mainstays on growers’ lists. The past two years, thanks to a joint NCDA and USDA grant, we also had the opportunity to evaluate some cultivars that are already widely grown in North Carolina. A total of 57 annual and perennial cut flowers were evaluated for postharvest vase life during the 2012 and 2013 seasons.

Trial varieties were planted in four plots of sixteen plants each. All marketable flowers were cut, measured, and recorded in the field three days per week. Up to 60 stems per variety were sorted into four uniform groups and bundled for postharvest vase life evaluation.

Bundles were placed into their first solution for four hours. Then they were transferred to a second solution for 48 hours. The first treatment, a hydrator, is intended to promote rapid water uptake and does not include sugar, while the second treatment, a holding solution, has sugar to promote long vase life. The four resulting treatments were:

  1. Hydrator only (no preservative)
  2. Holding preservative only (no hydrator)
  3. Hydrator, then holding preservative
  4. De-ionized water only (control)

Once pretreatments were done, each stem was placed in its own mason jar in conditions simulating consumers’ homes. Stems were checked daily and terminated once they reached an agreed-upon stage of expiration.

The results of these postharvest evaluations give growers information that helps them make decisions about the best cut flower varieties to include on their farm.

– H. Granitz

Preliminary Discoveries of Varied Rain Garden Substrate Compositions

Rain garden installed to capture polluted stormwater runoff from an asphalt parking lot.

Rain garden installed to capture polluted stormwater runoff from an asphalt parking lot.

Rain gardens are popular stormwater control measures that are non-irrigated, planted landscape features designed to capture polluted stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces. They are built by excavating and creating depression areas within the landscape so that the stormwater can be captured and allowed to infiltrate (1). After excavation they are refilled with an engineered filter bed substrate and planted. An environment is created within the rain garden where adsorption, filtration, sedimentation, volatilization, ion exchange, plant uptake and biological decomposition occur (3).

Sand based filter bed substrates are generally recommended due to their slow drainage (2). In North Carolina, these sand filter bed substrates are often 85-88% by volume sand, 8-12% fines (silt and clay), and 3-5% organic matter (3). It is currently recommended to use pine bark for the organic matter which has low P content, low cation exchange capacity and does not bind many pollutants. However, there are potential alternative filter bed substrates such as slate, organic matter sources such as compost and methods of adding organic matter that can support plant growth and remediate polluted stormwater runoff similar to or better than the recommended sand filter bed substrates. The main objective of this research was to determine the effect from the addition of different sources of organic matter amendments to rain garden filter bed substrates on plant growth.

Two rain garden plants (Panicum virgatum L. ‘Shenandoah’ and Monarda fistulosa L.) were grown in thirty-two substrates that resulted from combinations of two filter bed substrates, two organic matter sources, two combination methods, and eight different combination amounts. The two filter bed substrates used were sand and slate. Both, sand and slate were amended with two different organic matter sources: pine bark and composted yard waste. Pine bark and composted yard waste were added as either a band in the depths of 1, 2, 3, or 4 inches or by incorporation using approximately the same amounts of organic matter in the amounts of 5, 10, 15, and 20% (vol./vol.).

Panicum virgatum ‘Shenandoah’ shoot growth in 100% slate  (left), slate amended with a 4” band of pine bark (middle), and slate amended with a 4” band of composted yard waste  (right).

Panicum virgatum ‘Shenandoah’ shoot growth in 100% slate
(left), slate amended with a 4” band of pine bark (middle),
and slate amended with a 4” band of composted yard waste

Rain gardens are one of the more utilized stormwater control measures because they are able to fit into many different types of spaces (small or large) unlike other options. They also provide numerous ecological benefits and if planted appropriately can be aesthetically pleasing. For this study, both sand and slate filter bed substrates created a suitable environment for plant growth. With the addition of composted yard waste, both species were larger than when pine bark was added to the sand or slate filter bed substrates.

Elizabeth D. Riley1, Helen T. Kraus1, Ted E. Bilderback1, and James S. Owen Jr.2

1 Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
2 Department of Horticulture, Virginia Tech University, Virginia Beach, VA 23455

Literature Cited:

  1. Dietz, M. E. 2007. Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 186, 351-363.
  2. Hsieh, C., and A.P. Davis. 2005. “Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Media for Treatment of Urban Storm Water Runoff.” Journal of Environmental Engineering 131.11: 1521.
  3. North Carolina Division Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). 2009. Stormwater Best Management Practice Manual.